🔗 Share this article

Families of people laid to rest in graves vulnerable to coastal erosion state that a lack of decision on how best to address the problem is creating avoidable anguish about the final resting places of their departed family.

A Looming Threat to Ancient Graveyards

The council have identified three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being engulfed by the sea in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the situation details a series of options, from taking no action to exhuming remains and relocating them in safer locations. Authorities say it is for local people to decide how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. They wanted this to serve as their last home, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Projections indicate at least a portion of one graveyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner remembered a childhood visit to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the water, including its church and graveyard.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get washed out to sea. They won’t. Individuals will collect remains as mementos and go plundering graves looking for treasures. That is completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be bones on the shore. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Peril

Further up the shoreline lies the burial plot of a ex-soldier killed while serving abroad. His mother expressed she could not sleep after learning her child's final plot might one day be relocated.

“It truly disturb me to consider this won’t be his permanent resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an important place to go.”

She believes, new burials should stop but says it is premature to disturb existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Seeking Solutions and Clarity

The lack of agreement over the timing and method to tackle the problem has resulted in grieving relatives feeling exasperated and anxious.

Some want more sea defences to delay the unavoidable loss and to permit burials to proceed for now. Different voices argue the moment for moving graves is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A local official confirmed the graveyards were under the care of the church authorities. “In the end it is down to them to decide the direction to take. Our role is here to assist them through that process with residents.”

He added there was ample time to weigh all the options. “This concerns many years before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no common view on what should be done yet. We need good community discussions to find the appropriate answers for each community.”

The possibility of losing the churches and graveyards was described as one of “immense sadness for the area,” but faith leaders also spoke of a belief in resurrection, offering a spiritual viewpoint on the temporal loss of sacred ground.